Make the AS path longer, losing traffic, and therefore revenue? Why would they do that?
The twtelecom customers cannot multi-home (most of them anyway). Most of 3549’s traffic has other paths to the Internet. -- TTFN, patrick > On Jan 21, 2016, at 2:22 PM, Matthew D. Hardeman <mharde...@ipifony.com> > wrote: > > I was actually surprised they didn’t just leave GBLX customers on AS3549, > kill all external AS3549 peerings, and treat AS3549 downline as a Level3 > customer, accepting L3 and GBLX communities from GBLX customers. > > That seems more along the lines of what they’re doing with the AS4323 TW > Telecom customers. (Though, in fairness, AS3356 has always carried AS4323 as > a customer as far as I recall.) It will be interesting to see if whether > they kill off AS4323 peerings. > >> On Jan 21, 2016, at 1:13 PM, Marty Strong <ma...@cloudflare.com> wrote: >> >> Depends on the market and how far along their migration is going. In >> experience with GTT (AS4436) they’re still not finished migrating everything >> to AS3257. >> >> Regards, >> Marty Strong >> -------------------------------------- >> CloudFlare - AS13335 >> Network Engineer >> ma...@cloudflare.com >> +44 7584 906 055 >> smartflare (Skype) >> >> http://www.peeringdb.com/view.php?asn=13335 >> >>> On 21 Jan 2016, at 19:12, Matthew D. Hardeman <mharde...@ipifony.com> wrote: >>> >>> Intriguing. If it were only that though, wouldn’t they just still pick it >>> up via TeliaSonera IC? >>> >>> I did notice that in the past few months, TeliaSonera has been dropping >>> AS3549 from spots where they had session with both AS3549 and with AS3356 >>> and now reaches AS3549 via AS3356. >>> >>> >>>> On Jan 21, 2016, at 1:08 PM, Marty Strong <ma...@cloudflare.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> I’ve heard from the grape vine that this is due to the GBLX to Level3 >>>> transition, and it’s in fact paid IP transit. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Marty Strong >>>> -------------------------------------- >>>> CloudFlare - AS13335 >>>> Network Engineer >>>> ma...@cloudflare.com >>>> +44 7584 906 055 >>>> smartflare (Skype) >>>> >>>> http://www.peeringdb.com/view.php?asn=13335 >>>> >>>>> On 21 Jan 2016, at 18:37, Matthew D. Hardeman <mharde...@ipifony.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Yesterday I was looking at some of the IPv4 and IPv6 session summaries on >>>>> http://lg.he.net and saw that both the Equinix Los Angeles and Equinix >>>>> Ashburn site routers have new IPv4 and IPv6 sessions (not yet running, >>>>> but administratively up for about 6 days now) configured for AS3356. >>>>> >>>>> I know they already peer IPv6, though not at those sites. Is this the >>>>> first hint that HE and Level3 are coming around on an IPv4 and IPv6 >>>>> peering agreement? >>>> >>> >>
