Turns out my information from the grape vine was wrong *bows head in shame*.
Regards, Marty Strong -------------------------------------- CloudFlare - AS13335 Network Engineer ma...@cloudflare.com +44 7584 906 055 smartflare (Skype) http://www.peeringdb.com/view.php?asn=13335 > On 21 Jan 2016, at 19:48, Matthew D. Hardeman <mharde...@ipifony.com> wrote: > > That’s an excellent point, actually. > >> On Jan 21, 2016, at 1:45 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore <patr...@ianai.net> wrote: >> >> Make the AS path longer, losing traffic, and therefore revenue? >> >> Why would they do that? >> >> The twtelecom customers cannot multi-home (most of them anyway). Most of >> 3549’s traffic has other paths to the Internet. >> >> -- >> TTFN, >> patrick >> >>> On Jan 21, 2016, at 2:22 PM, Matthew D. Hardeman <mharde...@ipifony.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> I was actually surprised they didn’t just leave GBLX customers on AS3549, >>> kill all external AS3549 peerings, and treat AS3549 downline as a Level3 >>> customer, accepting L3 and GBLX communities from GBLX customers. >>> >>> That seems more along the lines of what they’re doing with the AS4323 TW >>> Telecom customers. (Though, in fairness, AS3356 has always carried AS4323 >>> as a customer as far as I recall.) It will be interesting to see if >>> whether they kill off AS4323 peerings. >>> >>>> On Jan 21, 2016, at 1:13 PM, Marty Strong <ma...@cloudflare.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Depends on the market and how far along their migration is going. In >>>> experience with GTT (AS4436) they’re still not finished migrating >>>> everything to AS3257. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Marty Strong >>>> -------------------------------------- >>>> CloudFlare - AS13335 >>>> Network Engineer >>>> ma...@cloudflare.com >>>> +44 7584 906 055 >>>> smartflare (Skype) >>>> >>>> http://www.peeringdb.com/view.php?asn=13335 >>>> >>>>> On 21 Jan 2016, at 19:12, Matthew D. Hardeman <mharde...@ipifony.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Intriguing. If it were only that though, wouldn’t they just still pick >>>>> it up via TeliaSonera IC? >>>>> >>>>> I did notice that in the past few months, TeliaSonera has been dropping >>>>> AS3549 from spots where they had session with both AS3549 and with AS3356 >>>>> and now reaches AS3549 via AS3356. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Jan 21, 2016, at 1:08 PM, Marty Strong <ma...@cloudflare.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I’ve heard from the grape vine that this is due to the GBLX to Level3 >>>>>> transition, and it’s in fact paid IP transit. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Marty Strong >>>>>> -------------------------------------- >>>>>> CloudFlare - AS13335 >>>>>> Network Engineer >>>>>> ma...@cloudflare.com >>>>>> +44 7584 906 055 >>>>>> smartflare (Skype) >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.peeringdb.com/view.php?asn=13335 >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 21 Jan 2016, at 18:37, Matthew D. Hardeman <mharde...@ipifony.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yesterday I was looking at some of the IPv4 and IPv6 session summaries >>>>>>> on http://lg.he.net and saw that both the Equinix Los Angeles and >>>>>>> Equinix Ashburn site routers have new IPv4 and IPv6 sessions (not yet >>>>>>> running, but administratively up for about 6 days now) configured for >>>>>>> AS3356. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I know they already peer IPv6, though not at those sites. Is this the >>>>>>> first hint that HE and Level3 are coming around on an IPv4 and IPv6 >>>>>>> peering agreement? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> >
