That’s an excellent point, actually. > On Jan 21, 2016, at 1:45 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore <patr...@ianai.net> wrote: > > Make the AS path longer, losing traffic, and therefore revenue? > > Why would they do that? > > The twtelecom customers cannot multi-home (most of them anyway). Most of > 3549’s traffic has other paths to the Internet. > > -- > TTFN, > patrick > >> On Jan 21, 2016, at 2:22 PM, Matthew D. Hardeman <mharde...@ipifony.com> >> wrote: >> >> I was actually surprised they didn’t just leave GBLX customers on AS3549, >> kill all external AS3549 peerings, and treat AS3549 downline as a Level3 >> customer, accepting L3 and GBLX communities from GBLX customers. >> >> That seems more along the lines of what they’re doing with the AS4323 TW >> Telecom customers. (Though, in fairness, AS3356 has always carried AS4323 >> as a customer as far as I recall.) It will be interesting to see if whether >> they kill off AS4323 peerings. >> >>> On Jan 21, 2016, at 1:13 PM, Marty Strong <ma...@cloudflare.com> wrote: >>> >>> Depends on the market and how far along their migration is going. In >>> experience with GTT (AS4436) they’re still not finished migrating >>> everything to AS3257. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Marty Strong >>> -------------------------------------- >>> CloudFlare - AS13335 >>> Network Engineer >>> ma...@cloudflare.com >>> +44 7584 906 055 >>> smartflare (Skype) >>> >>> http://www.peeringdb.com/view.php?asn=13335 >>> >>>> On 21 Jan 2016, at 19:12, Matthew D. Hardeman <mharde...@ipifony.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Intriguing. If it were only that though, wouldn’t they just still pick it >>>> up via TeliaSonera IC? >>>> >>>> I did notice that in the past few months, TeliaSonera has been dropping >>>> AS3549 from spots where they had session with both AS3549 and with AS3356 >>>> and now reaches AS3549 via AS3356. >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Jan 21, 2016, at 1:08 PM, Marty Strong <ma...@cloudflare.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I’ve heard from the grape vine that this is due to the GBLX to Level3 >>>>> transition, and it’s in fact paid IP transit. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Marty Strong >>>>> -------------------------------------- >>>>> CloudFlare - AS13335 >>>>> Network Engineer >>>>> ma...@cloudflare.com >>>>> +44 7584 906 055 >>>>> smartflare (Skype) >>>>> >>>>> http://www.peeringdb.com/view.php?asn=13335 >>>>> >>>>>> On 21 Jan 2016, at 18:37, Matthew D. Hardeman <mharde...@ipifony.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Yesterday I was looking at some of the IPv4 and IPv6 session summaries >>>>>> on http://lg.he.net and saw that both the Equinix Los Angeles and >>>>>> Equinix Ashburn site routers have new IPv4 and IPv6 sessions (not yet >>>>>> running, but administratively up for about 6 days now) configured for >>>>>> AS3356. >>>>>> >>>>>> I know they already peer IPv6, though not at those sites. Is this the >>>>>> first hint that HE and Level3 are coming around on an IPv4 and IPv6 >>>>>> peering agreement? >>>>> >>>> >>> >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
