Please check the nanog archives. There were some arguments that I and I assume others felt compelling why allocating a /64 per point to point link was a good idea. Your network, your rules. I was just responding to the argument that a /64 is wasteful and serves little purpose.
---- Matthew Huff | 1 Manhattanville Rd Director of Operations | Purchase, NY 10577 OTA Management LLC | Phone: 914-460-4039 aim: matthewbhuff | Fax: 914-694-5669 > -----Original Message----- > From: William Herrin [mailto:b...@herrin.us] > Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 4:56 PM > To: Matthew Huff <mh...@ox.com> > Cc: Michael Still <stillwa...@gmail.com>; nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: Questions on IPv6 deployment > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Matthew Huff <mh...@ox.com> wrote: > > The reason for allocating a /64 for a point to point link is due to > various denial of service attack vectors. > > Hi Matthew, > > I'm always interested in learning something new. Please explain the > DOS vectors you're referring to and how they're mitigated by > allocating a /64 to the point to point link. > > > > Just do it. > > No. But if you offer a good reason, I'll factor your reason in to my > considerations. > > Regards, > Bill Herrin > > -- > William Herrin ................ her...@dirtside.com b...@herrin.us > Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>
