Hi Bill,

> Op 17 jan. 2017, om 22:55 heeft William Herrin <b...@herrin.us> het volgende 
> geschreven:
> 
> I'm always interested in learning something new. Please explain the
> DOS vectors you're referring to and how they're mitigated by
> allocating a /64 to the point to point link.

One thing that comes to mind is that it seems that some routers only have 
limited space in their routing tables for prefixes longer than a /64. If you 
would configure a /127 on the link but push the /64 to the routing table then 
you might both avoid ND Cache exhaustion and avoid the limitations on 
longer-than-/64 prefixes.

I personally prefer to set up my addressing plan that things like this are 
possible even if I don't do it today, but I also understand the choices you 
make. I don't think any of the choices is wrong. It mostly depends on 
expectations, used equipment and personal preference.

And thanks for mentioning "Minimum assignment to a customer: /60". That is 
indeed a very important one!

Cheers,
Sander

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Reply via email to