Let me Bing that for you.

Oh, wait.


On 10/30/18 9:41 AM, Tom Beecher wrote:
Maybe Cogent refuses to work with Google so nobody can search for evidence of said cake....

:)

On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 4:55 PM Kenny Taylor <kenny.tay...@kccd.edu <mailto:kenny.tay...@kccd.edu>> wrote:

    I wasn't familiar with it, so thanks for sharing!  The Google search
    for 'he cogent cake' was entertaining.  Hard to believe that
    conflict is going on 9+ years..

    Kenny


    -----Original Message-----
    From: NANOG <nanog-boun...@nanog.org
    <mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org>> On Behalf Of Owen DeLong
    Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2018 2:54 PM
    To: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org <mailto:nanog@nanog.org>>
    Subject: Re: Whats going on at Cogent

    Mainly I wasn’t expounding because I’m surprised to learn that
    there’s anyone on this list unfamiliar with it.

    Didn’t want to bore people.

    I tended to speak my mind while I worked for HE, I’m certainly not
    going to stop as a result of no longer working there. ;-)

    Owen


     > On Oct 24, 2018, at 04:51 , John Peach
    <john-na...@peachfamily.net <mailto:john-na...@peachfamily.net>> wrote:
     >
     > On 10/23/2018 08:47 PM, Ross Tajvar wrote:
     >> Sorry all. I misread Owen's email. I'm not trying to air his
    private business to the list.
     >
     > There is no secret - a quick search on the terms HE, Cogent and
    peering (and possibly cake) will give you the answer. Presumably
    Owen is not expounding because he used to work for HE.
     >
     >> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018, 8:20 PM Brad Knowles
    <b...@shub-internet.org <mailto:b...@shub-internet.org>
    <mailto:b...@shub-internet.org <mailto:b...@shub-internet.org>>> wrote:
     >>    On Oct 23, 2018, at 10:32 AM, Ross Tajvar <r...@tajvar.io
    <mailto:r...@tajvar.io>
     >>    <mailto:r...@tajvar.io <mailto:r...@tajvar.io>>> wrote:
     >>     > I am also interested in hearing about this. I think it's
    relevant
     >>    to the current thread.
     >>    Speaking only for myself, there are companies where I have done
     >>    short-term contracts, and where I am definitely not interested in
     >>    any further employment opportunities with them.  OTOH, I am
    totally
     >>    happy to continue to be a customer of theirs.
     >>    Further discussion of that sort of thing would not be appropriate
     >>    here.  If Josh is in the same boat with HE, I totally understand.
     >>    For the Network Time Foundation (and related projects), I think
     >>    we've been pretty happy as a customer of HE, but then we're
    just a
     >>    small customer of theirs.
     >>    --     Brad Knowles <b...@shub-internet.org
    <mailto:b...@shub-internet.org> <mailto:b...@shub-internet.org
    <mailto:b...@shub-internet.org>>>
     >>    Please forgive any typos.  I'm fighting a failing keyboard on my
     >>    laptop, in addition to having a broken finger.
     >
     >
     >
     >
     > --
     > John
     > PGP Public Key: 412934AC

Reply via email to