As there has been no discussion on the list for over a month, can someone tell me where we stand on forming a census?
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 21:02, Margaret Wasserman <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > I am sending this message to several large groups of people with > considerable overlap in an effort to reach everyone who has been > participating (actively or passively) in the NAT66 discussions. PLEASE, > PLEASE do not reply to this full list. Send any replies to the new nat66 > discussion list (cc:ed) or to me privately. > > In response to concerns that have been raised about discussing IPv6-to-IPv6 > NAT on the behave WG mailing list, we have started a new mailing list for > the ongoing NAT66 discussion, [email protected]. The purpose of this list is > to discuss the needs that may drive the adoption of IPv6-to-IPv6 NAT, and to > discuss solutions to meet those needs, possibly including specification of > an IPv6 NAT mechanism, that will work better and be less harmful to the > Internet than direct ports of IPv4 NA(P)T functionality. Although we will > see how the conversation evolves in the upcoming weeks, our current > expectation is that we will hold a BOF at IETF 74 in San Francisco to > discuss this topic and to determine if there is consensus that the IETF > should pursue any work in this area. > > It is not our intention that this new list will be used for discuss of > IPv4/IPv6 transition mechanisms, even those that involve translation. > Discussion of the v4v6translation work will remain in the behave WG, where > it is a chartered work item. > > If you would like to join the nat66 mailing list list or read the list > archives, you can do so via the following URL: > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66 > > If you would like to actively contribute to the discussion, I would suggest > that you start by reading the following documents: > > - RFC 4864: Local Network Protection for IPv6 > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4864.txt?number=4864 > > - Renumbering still needs work > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-carpenter-renum-needs-work-00.txt > > - IPv6-to-IPv6 Network Address Translation (NAT66) -- now somewhat > out-of-date > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4864.txt?number=4864 > > - IETF 73 behave WG Presentation on NAT66 -- more up-to-date > http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/08nov/slides/behave-14.pdf > > Then, come join the discussion on the [email protected] mailing list. > > Margaret > > _______________________________________________ > Behave mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave >
_______________________________________________ nat66 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
