Hi,
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 07:15:14AM -0500, Margaret Wasserman wrote:
> Fred Baker did include a "customer" presentation (why the Cisco IT
> department requires an IPv6 NAT) in his slides at the BEHAVE WG
> meeting in MInneapolis.
Are these slides available online? I'd like to look at it and understand
why a company that has an IPv6 /32 - which already brings all the
usual reasons listed, like "not renumbering, provider independence,
stable internal addressing" - thinks they need to use NAT.
(And no, layer 3 loadbalancing gear is not something I'd consider "NAT",
even if it technically is very similar - there you might actually need
some packet munging, but this is very special-cased)
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 128645
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
_______________________________________________
nat66 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
