On 3 Apr 2009, at 16:51, Keith Moore wrote:
RJ Atkinson wrote:
First, I've done some measurements. MUCH MUCH less than 1% of
IPv6 traffic in real enterprise deployments contain ANY
optional header.
How is that relevant when we're talking about an architectural issue?
Very relevant. Options that are not in use today are unlikely
to become very frequently used in the foreseeable future.
And to be clear, my thread is quite clearly focused on
*engineering* details for the specific case where a longer
IPv6 prefix might be allocated to an end user.
I haven't made any *architectural* postings in this thread,
at least so far. Its all been engineering.
We're seeing only the very earliest of IPv6 deployment. Surely we
can't
expect observed traffic to be any indicator of future use.
Surely we can and should. It won't be a perfect indicator,
since those don't exist, but it is certainly an informative
guide for what we might reasonably expect in future.
Yours,
Ran
_______________________________________________
nat66 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
