On Oct 28, 2010, at 3:50 PM, james woodyatt wrote:
If so, then I-D.mrw-nat66 cannot help you; it offers no privacy addressing. So, right now, it sounds like there isn't a publicly defined way to solve the problem you're here to discuss without using a stateful IPv6/NAT, which does well-understood harm to the Internet architecture and the Internet community beyond the domain of enterprises that use it.
NAT66 doesn't interfere in any way with the use of IPv6 privacy addresses.
Margaret _______________________________________________ nat66 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
