Le 2 nov. 2010 à 18:43, james woodyatt a écrit : > On Nov 2, 2010, at 09:50, Rémi Després wrote: >> >> Since the proposed ASCONF mechanism relies on NATs to support it by an ad >> hoc stateful function, this doesn't concern the proposed stateless NAT66. It >> therefore remains true that NAT66 and SCTP are incompatible. Right? > > Not really.
OK. As I wrote to Dan, I will look at that more deeply, in particular in the multi-homing case with NATs that don't support the "SCTP variant of NAT" of draft-ietf-behave-sctpnat-03. Regards, RD _______________________________________________ nat66 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
