> I suppose we could summarize all that in a neat table. To some extent, that is done in:
H. Naderi and B.E. Carpenter, A Review of IPv6 Multihoming Solutions, Tenth International Conference on Networks ( ICN 2011), St. Maarten, (January 2011) 145-150. http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~brian/multi6survey.pdf (NPTv6 is called NAT66 in the paper, since the renaming came too late.) _______________________________________________ nat66 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
