Thus wrote Brian E Carpenter ([email protected]):
> On 2011-03-03 19:51, S.P.Zeidler wrote:
> > The benefit does not cause any trouble.
> > The means by which you reach this benefit may.
> >
> > You see the distinction?
>
> Of course. PI has the cost of exploding the BGP4 table.
> NPTv6 has the cost of destroying address transparency.
>
> Since SHIM6 has neither of these costs, are you surprised
> that I prefer it?
The context of my remark (and what I was trying very hard to get across)
was "the wording you use is misleading or confusing".
"the benefits of XXX" is not the same as "the entire set of features
including cost of XXX" with XXX equal just about anything, by no means
limited to NPTv6, or politics, or the weather, or the Easter Bunny.
I would say that your preferences regarding the contents described are
not relevant to the question whether the description as such is parseable
correctly or not.
(Aaaargh!)
regards,
spz
--
[email protected] (S.P.Zeidler)
_______________________________________________
nat66 mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
