Le 8 mars 2011 à 18:29, Fred Baker a écrit : > I believe that's off-topic on this list.
Hopefully, there will be a place and a time to discuss that, but fair enough. (An private answer from Brian would be nice to have though.) Regards, RD > > On Mar 8, 2011, at 9:22 AM, Rémi Després wrote: > >> >> Le 3 mars 2011 à 20:48, Brian E Carpenter a écrit : >>> ... >>> Of course. PI has the cost of exploding the BGP4 table. >>> NPTv6 has the cost of destroying address transparency. >>> >>> Since SHIM6 has neither of these costs, are you surprised >>> that I prefer it? >> >> SHIM6 is a solution, but AFAIK it needs that hosts know: >> - their global addresses >> - means to force outgoing paths that go via the right CPE's (an >> ingress-filtering constraint) >> >> In a site using ULAs and having several links, a complement is therefore >> needed. >> SAM is an approach for this (ref. draft-despres-softwire-sam-01 - sec. 3.3), >> and AFAIK the only documented one so far. >> Would you agree on this? >> >> RD >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> nat66 mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66 > _______________________________________________ nat66 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nat66
