On 9/14/06, Zoran Vasiljevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi!
Motivated by the Vlad's recent report, I took another
tour arround the code and did yet-another cleanup phase.
Amazing howmany things you can find when you revisit the
code after some time...
I have fixed numerous MT-safeness problems, removed the
"-minslaves" config option and added new [ns_proxy pools]
command. I also updated the test-suite to check more cases.
Also the problem reported by Vlad should be fixed as well.
Altogether, this thing now seems pretty usable :-)
If you discover something what you can undoubtfully
classify as a bug, plese tell me as soon as possible
as I would like to get this code integrated in our product
(having more testers is an obvious plus for us, hehe).
This code looks wrong:
/*
* It is pain in the neck to get a satisfactory definition of
* u_int_XX_t or uintXX_t as different OS'es do that in different
* header files and sometimes even do not define such types at all.
* We choose to define them ourselves here and stop the blues.
*/
typedef unsigned int uint32;
typedef unsigned short uint16;
What if int's are 64 bit? There is this code in the Tcl example extension:
#ifdef HAVE_INTTYPES_H
# include <inttypes.h>
typedef uint32_t sha_uint32_t;
#else
# if ((1<<31)<0)
typedef unsigned long sha_uint32_t;
# else
typedef unsigned int sha_uint32_t;
# endif
#endif
