In out simplest case no benefits because out repository structure does
not change often. It is just more modern source control thing, but we
can stay on CVS.
Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
On 20.09.2006, at 21:26, Vlad Seryakov wrote:
Strange, i just ran this command i did not have error messages
Yes. I tried it again and it worked here as well.
It seems that this thing is not that stable as
one would think...
I sill miss the real benefit. As we are not hosting
the repository, what obvious benefits we will get from svn?
I mostly do cvs update, cvs commit and sometimes cvs diff.
Very seldom cvs rtag.
So, how is this svn going to change my life (to better)
if I now use svn instead of cvs? I still see no benefit
but I'm sure you can tell me couple of them.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
naviserver-devel mailing list
naviserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/
