On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Gustaf Neumann <neum...@wu.ac.at> wrote: > > It is interesting to see, that with always 5 connections threads running and > using jemalloc, we see a rss consumption only slightly larger than with > plain tcl and zippy malloc having maxthreads == 2, having less requests > queued. > > Similarly, with tcmalloc we see with minthreads to 5, maxthreads 10 > > requests 2062 spools 49 queued 3 connthreads 6 rss 376 > requests 7743 spools 429 queued 359 connthreads 11 rss 466 > requests 8389 spools 451 queued 366 connthreads 12 rss 466 > > which is even better.
Min/max threads 5/10 better than 2/10? How about 7/10? When you hit 10/10 you can delete an awful lot of code :-) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d _______________________________________________ naviserver-devel mailing list naviserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
