Am 05.12.12 00:41, schrieb Stephen Deasey: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Gustaf Neumann <neum...@wu.ac.at> wrote: >> It is interesting to see, that with always 5 connections threads running and >> using jemalloc, we see a rss consumption only slightly larger than with >> plain tcl and zippy malloc having maxthreads == 2, having less requests >> queued. >> >> Similarly, with tcmalloc we see with minthreads to 5, maxthreads 10 >> >> requests 2062 spools 49 queued 3 connthreads 6 rss 376 >> requests 7743 spools 429 queued 359 connthreads 11 rss 466 >> requests 8389 spools 451 queued 366 connthreads 12 rss 466 >> >> which is even better. > Min/max threads 5/10 better than 2/10? the numbers show that 5/10 with tcmalloc is better than 5/10 with jemalloc and only slghtly worse than 2/2 with zippymalloc.
-gn ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d _______________________________________________ naviserver-devel mailing list naviserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/naviserver-devel
