On Thursday, 14. February 2002 20:52, you wrote:
> I would have preferred to see a diff but anyway: the only difference
> I see is that you half the size of memory to allocate.
>
> I'm sure that's wrong. The reason that you don't see any problems is
> that you don't do any other operations that use the offscreen
> framebuffer.
> However it is very likely that your video image is leaking into the
> memory reserved for the HW cursor.
Egbert, you are right. I made a clean room setup with the source from
4.2.0 and your patch. Xine crashes like before, but with commenting the
statement in neo_driver.c with the if(lines>1024) ..., it works, but why
did you comment out the first part of the if-statement?
I changed:
if (/* nPtr->NeoChipset < NM2200 &&*/ lines > 1024)
lines = 1024;
to
/* if ( nPtr->NeoChipset < NM2200 && lines > 1024)
lines = 1024;
*/
But i think
if (nPtr->NeoChipset < NM2200 && lines > 1024)
lines = 1024;
would be all right, too?!
ff
--
SYNTAGS GmbH, Märkische Str. 237, D-44141 Dortmund, Germany
Security, Cryptography, Networks, Software Development
http://www.syntags.de mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Neomagic mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/neomagic
