On Thursday, 14. February 2002 20:52, you wrote: > I would have preferred to see a diff but anyway: the only difference > I see is that you half the size of memory to allocate. > > I'm sure that's wrong. The reason that you don't see any problems is > that you don't do any other operations that use the offscreen > framebuffer. > However it is very likely that your video image is leaking into the > memory reserved for the HW cursor.
Egbert, you are right. I made a clean room setup with the source from 4.2.0 and your patch. Xine crashes like before, but with commenting the statement in neo_driver.c with the if(lines>1024) ..., it works, but why did you comment out the first part of the if-statement? I changed: if (/* nPtr->NeoChipset < NM2200 &&*/ lines > 1024) lines = 1024; to /* if ( nPtr->NeoChipset < NM2200 && lines > 1024) lines = 1024; */ But i think if (nPtr->NeoChipset < NM2200 && lines > 1024) lines = 1024; would be all right, too?! ff -- SYNTAGS GmbH, Märkische Str. 237, D-44141 Dortmund, Germany Security, Cryptography, Networks, Software Development http://www.syntags.de mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Neomagic mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/neomagic