Thank you. I'll do it that way.

On Saturday, October 17, 2015 at 9:26:23 AM UTC-4, Mitch wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> The seven digit, IN-18 board is on order so I'm on to the next project, a 
> fifteen digit Union Square Metronome type clock similar to Jarek's clock 
> here:
> http://hackaday.com/tag/metronome/
>
> Four HV5530s will be connected in series and updated every second, driving 
> twelve Nixies. That should not be a problem. One HV5530 will update two, 
> 1/10 second, and one, 1/100 second Nixie, updated at 10ms.
>
> All five will have the blanking lines connected together, to a PWM pin. 
> That leaves Data, Clock, and Latch, and only two extra level shifters are 
> available on the CD4054B. 
>
> My thought is that only the latch line on the four HV5530s needs to be 
> separated from the latch line on the single, fifth HV5530 because even 
> though the data will be presented and clocked to all five HV5530s, if it is 
> never latched and subsequently replaced with it's correct data, incorrect 
> data will never latch to the wrong display.
>
> With two available level shifters and pins available on the 1284P, clock 
> and latch could be separated, but I'm not sure if separating the clock line 
> too, will make a difference.
>
> Please give me advice on this.
>
> By the way, the cost estimate for the seven digit, IN-18 board from OSH 
> Park was just over $210 for three boards, with shipping. I decided to try 
> PCBWay this time because their estimate was $70 with DHL shipping for five 
> boards.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send an email to neonixie-l@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/neonixie-l/7b16c4ff-8f2f-40dd-8925-cf56cbff27e0%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to