> On April 20, 2013, 4:14 a.m., Simeon Bird wrote:
> > common/regexpcache.cpp, line 108
> > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109991/diff/2/?file=139540#file139540line108>
> >
> >     Do you really need to initialise this?
> 
> Lukasz Olender wrote:
>     I'm not sure - size_t is always initialized '0' by default?

I'm not sure, so just leave it alone.


On April 20, 2013, 4:14 a.m., Lukasz Olender wrote:
> > Could you also add to the commit message a comment on the sort of 
> > performance gains this patch produces? ie, is it O(10%), or an order of 
> > magnitude? Also, how much of the improvement is due to the combining of 
> > filters in createPattern?, and how much just to rolling the RegEx into one 
> > long (||||) one?
> 
> Lukasz Olender wrote:
>     I've added it. It's about 5 times faster using standard Nepomuk's filters 
> on my machine. Actually, combining them against just joining with "|" makes 
> all of the difference. My solution will be unfortunately about two times 
> slower if I'll just join all those filters by "|" and let QRegExp do the job 
> (it's easy to check by setting minOccur variable in createPattern method to 
> value bigger than number of filters). I've added this information in comment 
> to createPattern method (now it's named groupPatterns). Probably it will be 
> slower if filters won't have any common patterns (for example if user will 
> have a number of ignored files and no common filters at all). In such a 
> situation, we can switch to old behavior, but it's quite hard to check when 
> it's worth switching, so I'm leaving it as it is. I realize there might be a 
> need to handle also that cases.

Ok, good! 


- Simeon


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109991/#review31314
-----------------------------------------------------------


On April 24, 2013, 6:45 a.m., Lukasz Olender wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109991/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 24, 2013, 6:45 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Nepomuk and Vishesh Handa.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> It's related with https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303654. 
> P.S. I accidentally deleted author's and license info in patch. Isolated 
> performance tests are also uploaded to http://www.sendspace.com/file/mkihdp 
> (previous link not always work). It's my first patch.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug 303654.
>     http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303654
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   common/regexpcache.h d89f968 
>   common/regexpcache.cpp df45277 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109991/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Lukasz Olender
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Nepomuk mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk

Reply via email to