On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 02:03:40PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Michel Arboi wrote:
> >>Because NASL is not so much a language than big set of functions
> >>which are under the GPL.
> >And because there is only one interpretor, which is GPLed.
>
> There is something I'm not able to understand: if nasl is under the GPL
> how can I use Teneable's plugin which are licensed under a different and
> incompatible license?
Because Tenable owns the copyright on NASL. So it can grant you the
right to run a select set of non-GPL plugins with it (this has already
been covered in the past).
-- Renaud
_______________________________________________
Nessus mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus
