Benjamin Tomhave wrote:

Additionally, am wondering what assurances have been taken to ensure that
ideas contributed to the open-source Nessus project over the years are not
incorporated into the commercial version that is to be released under a
closed license?  GPL covers more than just code - it covers ideas, too.

I'm afraid that's not true. In our current economic system ideas are
only covered by patents, which do not apply (in some countries,
fortunately) to software. So Tenable is free to take "ideas" from the
Nessus community and use it in whatever form they wish.

If you were talking about code itself, I would agree, they would need
to contact each and every contributor to the code to ask them to
relicense their patches. Either that or remove the patches, and start
with code that is entirely the copyright of Tenable (or Tenable's
employees) and use that for the basis for a non-free product.

The issue here might be: is a one liner patch considered copyrighted
by who wrote it? What length does a patch to the code significant
enough to require Tenable to contact the contributor before using it
in a non-free product?

This issue was not brought up by plugin contributors when Tenable
change the license of some plugins, BTW. Even though they had
contributed (before the license change) to what they though were GPL
plugins.

In any case, I guess that whomever has concerns with this and believes
that the license change is a violation of _his_ copyright  should
bring this issue up with Tenable directly instead of through this list.

Would hate to see a commercial product deployed that included ideas
generated by the FOSS community...

I don't believe that's an issue. I actually think that ideas should
freely flow between both camps. Code, however, which was licensed in
one form needs to be relicensed to go through that barrier, and the
legitimate copyright holders of the code can do that.

Regards

Javier


_______________________________________________
Nessus mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus

Reply via email to