On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 14:43:15 +0100 Dave wrote: DS> On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 14:40, Robert Story wrote: DS> > On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 09:47:35 +0100 Dave wrote: DS> > DS> If you can convince the manager of the 5.1.x line, that's fine by me. DS> > DS> > Hmm.. I guess that would be Wes, who hasn't spoken up. DS> DS> Nope. DS> Wes is release manager for 5.0.x (and the main development line).
The question is, is there a difference between a 'manager of a line' and a 'release manager'? 5.0.x was mine, but Wes decided to take over release 5.0.10 (much to my relief). DS> Check http://www.net-snmp.org/dev/schedule.html for the identity DS> of the 5.1.x release manager :-) I know I'm in charge of 5.1.3, but don't know that I should imply that I'm not in charge of the 5.1.x line and all future 5.1.x releases... -- NOTE: messages sent directly to me, instead of the lists, will be deleted unless they are requests for paid consulting services. Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie Support: <http://www.net-snmp.org/> <irc://irc.freenode.net/#net-snmp> Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=net-snmp-coders> You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
