On 24 November 2010 06:57, Bart Van Assche <bvanass...@acm.org> wrote:
> It might be a better idea to convert Quagga from SMUX to AgentX. If you do
> this properly, it will be possible to choose at run-time between running
> Quagga as a stand-alone agent or an AgentX-subagent.

I would strongly support this approach.

The AgentX protocol and subagent framework is very similar to a standard
SNMP setup, and it should be straightforward to develop a module that
would work either as a standalone SNMP agent, or as an AgentX subagent.
This would give you the best of both worlds.

Dave

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App & Earn a Chance To Win $500!
Tap into the largest installed PC base & get more eyes on your game by
optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get started today with the
Intel(R) Software Partner Program. Five $500 cash prizes are up for grabs.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intelisp-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders

Reply via email to