> > Is this a library/agent that you've compiled yourself,
> > or a pre-installed version?
> 
> It's possible.  Yet on this system there should only be
> one instance of net-snmp.  It's a dual-boot machine that
> boots into two flavors of SuSE.  But they shouldn't share
> any files since they are on their own partition.  Is that
> true in general?

In general, yes.


> That said, I do swap snmpd.conf & snmp.conf files pretty
> generously.  My setup is that one (say Load1) has 5.0.8,
> 5.0.9, and 5.1.1pre2 installed.  He works fine.  The other
> boot (Load2) only has 5.0.8, but he's the one giving me
> the error.  I did copy the snmpd.conf & snmp.conf from 
> Load1 to Load2, but I thought that was okay to do.

Yes - that should be safe enough.
It's mixing binaries that's dangerous - config files are
not a problem.


> So you can think of Load1 as my development environment
> where I can load anything I want and go crazy.  Load2 is
> supposed to stay pristine and clean so as to closely
> match an actual production environment.

That's sensible.


>                                         So to finally
> dodge your question, I'm not sure exactly how netsnmp is
> installed on Load2 since I didn't actually do it.  My
> guess is that it was loaded from some rpm -- and I'd
> doubt if any configure was ever run -- if you do that
> with binary rpms.

Well, there must have been a "configure" run at *some* point,
in order to compile the thing in the first place.  So I'm
wondering if there's a mismatch between the setup on that
box, and on yours.   Perhaps another RPM that this RPM
relies on, but isn't listed as an explicit dependency.



> >    If you run into that sort of problems, it's often worth
> > uninstalling *both* sides, and re-running the configure,
> > compile, install cycle, to get a clear setup.
> 
> How do you uninstall?  rpm -e ?

Yes, but if you're wanting to work with a binary distribution,
then that doesn't feel the right approach.   I certainly
wouldn't advise forcing this removal.

It would feel more profitable to try and track down the missing
system call(s).   "hosts_ctl" sounds like part of the libwrap
mechanism.   I'm not sure if SuSE is the same, but on my RedHat
box, this is provided by the "tcp_wrappers" RPM.  Do you have
that installed?

Dave



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - 
digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, 
unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users

Reply via email to