Merry Christmas Ed

thank a lot for the info...

regards,
ajit

On Dec 24, 2007 6:53 PM, Kuczynski, Edward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I afraid it didn't happen to me, just to a friend, so I added that as
> another item to try.
>
> Merry Christmas!
>
> Ed
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Dave Shield
> Sent: Friday, December 21, 2007 3:42 PM
> To: Kuczynski, Edward
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Timeout: No Response from localhost.
>
> On 21/12/2007, Kuczynski, Edward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We ran into a problem having both readonly and r/w in the conf file for
> v2.
> > It wouldn't hurt to comment out the r/w and try again.
>
> Would you care to expand on the problem you were seeing?
>
> The usual issue with rw/ro clashes is when you have the
> same community (or SNMPv3 user) for both ro and rw.
> In that situation, it tends to be SET requests that fail
> (when the read-only configuration is applied first).
>
> I've never come across a situation where having both
> rw and ro settings would block GET requests.
>
> Dave
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Net-snmp-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users

Reply via email to