2008/4/23 Mike Ayers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > The table_dataset/group_tdata functions are for > > "datamatted" [sic] tables > > > those for which you store the data and forget. > > > > That's true for 'table_dataset', but not for 'table_tdata'. > > http://www.net-snmp.org/dev/agent/modules.html > > Did I misread, or is the tdata documentation incorrect?
The documentation is incorrect - or at least the headline description is misleading. I'm not too clear exactly what Wes originally meant by "datamatted" (table_data) vs "automatted" (table_dataset). And the table_tdata comments were effectively carried over from the earlier helper. It's been said before, and I wouldn't disagree Net-SNMP documentation sucks > So is there a set of user level table functions that don't need mib2c? Nothing *needs* mib2c. (Except perhaps the MfD framework). It is perfectly possible to use the various table helpers in hand-crafted code That's typically how I work a lot of the time. All mib2c does is to handle the donkey-work of generating a suitable template for a given table, from the MIB definitions. There's nothing inherently special about the code produced. If you prefer to code the handler manually, using a different structure or layout etc, that's fine. The mib2c output simply shows how to use the relevant helper API calls. I'm not sure whether that answers your question - partly because I'm not entirely clear what you mean by "user level table functions" Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
