> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Shield > Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 1:48 AM
> It's been said before, and I wouldn't disagree > > Net-SNMP documentation sucks Compared to most projects I've seen, I think that's too harsh. There is room for improvement, yes. > I'm not sure whether that answers your question - partly > because I'm not entirely clear what you mean by "user level > table functions" That was sufficient answer for me. I really need to play around with the kit more, but I keep reformatting my 'nixen boxes and losing all my sandboxes... Thanks, Mike ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-users mailing list Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users