> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Shield
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 1:48 AM
> It's been said before, and I wouldn't disagree
>
> Net-SNMP documentation sucks
Compared to most projects I've seen, I think that's too harsh. There
is room for improvement, yes.
> I'm not sure whether that answers your question - partly
> because I'm not entirely clear what you mean by "user level
> table functions"
That was sufficient answer for me. I really need to play around with
the kit more, but I keep reformatting my 'nixen boxes and losing all my
sandboxes...
Thanks,
Mike
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
