Both machines are loaded with same modules, but in different order.
ThanksXuan
> Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 22:10:12 +0100
> Subject: Re: Strange behavior on linkUpDownNotifications
> From: d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.uk
> To: b...@live.com
> CC: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>
> 2010/4/7 X Z <b...@live.com>:
> > The working one (see link up down traps) has the following output:
> > trap: send_trap -1 -1 NET-SNMP-MIB::netSnmpAgentOIDs.10
>
> > The nonworking one has the following output:
> > trap: send_trap -1 -1 NET-SNMP-TC::linux
>
> These actually both refer to the same OID.
>
>
> > Any ideas why the two different MIBs are used?
>
> Have a look at both what MIBs are installed on the two systems,
> and what MIBs are actually *loaded*.
> The debug flag 'parse-mibs' might be useful for this.
>
>
> Though I've no idea why this might affect linkUp/Down traps.
>
> Dave
_________________________________________________________________
The New Busy think 9 to 5 is a cute idea. Combine multiple calendars with
Hotmail.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multicalendar&ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_5------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
