Running "net-snmp-config --snmpd-module-list" on the two machines gave the 
exactly same list of modules loaded.
ThanksXuan
> Subject: RE: Strange behavior on linkUpDownNotifications‏
> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 16:26:53 -0700
> From: mike_ay...@tva.tvworks.com
> To: b...@live.com; d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.uk
> CC: net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> 
> > From: X Z [mailto:b...@live.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 8:49 AM
> 
> > The machine with link traps not working is loaded with the following
> > additional MIB modules:
> > SMUX-MIB
> > AGENTX-MIB
> > SNMP-PROXY-MIB
> > RMON-MIB
> > SNMPv2-CONF
> > DISMAN-SCRIPT-MIB
> > NET-SNMP-TC
> > SNMP-USM-AES-MIB
> > IF-INVERTED-STACK-MIB
> > SNMP-USM-DH-OBJECTS-MIB
> > HCNUM-TC
> 
>       MIB modules or MIB files?  The definition does not cause the 
> implementation.
> 
> > etc
> > 
> > Is there a way to specify exactly which MIB modules to be loaded when
> > starting the agent? And how to do that? I just wonder if that will
> > solve the puzzle.
> 
>       Check out the "-I" flag.  But perhaps what you want is ` 
> net-snmp-config --snmpd-module-list`, which tells what modules are in your 
> agent.
> 
> 
>       HTH,
> 
> Mike
> 
                                          
_________________________________________________________________
The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_3
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
Net-snmp-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users

Reply via email to