On 10 February 2012 15:02, Francois Bouchard <[email protected]> wrote:
> Is there defference in the code using mib2c -S cache=1 -c
> mib2c.table_data.conf myTable instead of
> mib2c -c mib2c.table_data.conf my myTable, option 1) ?
Errr... that second form looks invalid.
mib2c only takes a single root OID.
It would either be
mib2c -c mib2c.table_data.conf my
or
mib2c -c mib2c.table_data.conf myTable
Not both.
I'm not quite sure why you're being asked questions
(unless it's because of the invalid invocation) - table_data
is a single, non-interactive configuration.
But to answer your question - yes, I believe -S cache=1
*is* different to "local cached copy" option
Dave
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing
also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
