does anyone object to me posting a definitely not-safe-for-work
response to this in the style of an arrogant lower class foul-mouthed
human being? it's just that i feel the need to... but, as much as i
pretend to be distanced and to have evolved from such attitudes and
responses it still just... grrrr...





On 10 July 2010 13:55, marc garrett <marc.garr...@furtherfield.org> wrote:
> The Digital Surplus and Its Enemies.
>
> By Rob Horning
>
> With the advent of Web 2.0, the Internet has begun to take on the
> characteristics of what the Italian autonomists like Paolo Virno called
> the social factory. The idea is that since many of us no longer have all
> that much to offer society, in terms of operating machinery or that sort
> of thing, the new way of extracting surplus value from our “labor” is to
> turn our social lives into a kind of covert work that we complete
> throughout the day, but in forms that can be co-opted by capitalist firms.
>
> Work processes, as Virno explains in A Grammar of the Multitude
> [Semiotext(e); 2004], become diverse, but social life begins to
> homogenize itself in the sense that our identity becomes something we
> all must prove in the public sphere—we all become concerned with the
> self as brand. This results in the “valorization”—Marxist jargon for
> value enhancement—“of all that which renders the life of an individual
> unique”—which is to say our concern for our uniqueness, our identity in
> social contexts, becomes a kind of value-generating capital, or rather a
> circulating commodity.
>
> This plays out in seemingly innocuous ways. It can be a matter of hyping
> a product free of charge but using it or talking about it. Or it can be
> a matter of going to parties with co-workers, learning to get along
> better and therefore increasing the efficiency of processes on the job.
> Or it is a matter of behaving politely among strangers, extending a
> system of politeness and trust that can be harvested economically as a
> reduction in transaction costs. To put it in sociologist Pierre
> Bourdieu’s terms, our habitus—our manifest and class-bound way of being
> in the social world—has been transformed into an explicit productive
> force without our conscious consent by the way various social media have
> infiltrated everyday life.
>
> more...
> http://www.popmatters.com/pm/tools/print/120581
> _______________________________________________
> NetBehaviour mailing list
> NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
> http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
>
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to