On 15/11/11 21:54, Eduardo Valle wrote: > Compatible is not equal so the British as a "good" and old empire will > be independent from a USA- NGO financed by Soros and etc.
Certainly there's no upgrade path to be abused if CC turn evil, and I can easily imagine sovereignty concerns playing a part. The OGL is usable alongside data under pretty much any free licence, but specifically resembles CC-BY. > They say to you use this license but they dont care about tracking in > fact they can track you, because they just want to control the content Tracking does not require free licencing. The major trackers all use Terms and Conditions to track you. > and not to sell your product (only if they think they profit - profit in > a broader sense). What they care is about selling technologies and > systems , and off course control the content , and also hype the ones > that are using in order to expand their network. Yes. Which is why it's strange Facebook and Twitter don't hype the "technologies" of these licences. > The benefit for the public ? Shure ? I am not shure, the systems of > tracking and the internet police are getting worse, so whats the use of > it ? The benefit of data to the public. Free culture and free data do not presuppose or support tracking. > Digital Culture is a term invented that can not be applied nowadays, > what we are seeing is a process of digitalization > of different cultures, in a world of various cultures. Yes I'd like to understand this better. > Sorry about my ignorance but what is FGPA and Tor style systems ? FGPA is "Field Gate Programmable Arrays", they are a kind of microchip that can be structured through software and used to emulate microprocessors: http://www.opensparc.net/fpga/index.html http://www.ht-lab.com/freecores/cpu8086/cpu86.html http://opencores.org/ TOR is "The Onion Router", a system for anonymous (but not encrypted!) web browsing: https://www.torproject.org/ > IPV6 is a private concern ? Can you develop on that. IPv6 is much better at identifying you to the network: http://www.ipv6.ru/russian/presscenter/press/ebsco/1.php > How can you say that Culture Flat Rate does not work ? Have you read the > reports on it ? I can say it doesn't work because it will go to the major record labels and remove any social or market incentives to create anything other than the blandest bandwidth-filler. > Systems - interfaces - terms of use - moderators - quite the same > everywhere. Not at all. http://autonomo.us/2008/07/franklin-street-statement/ https://duckduckgo.com/ https://identi.ca/ https://joindiaspora.com/ http://libre.fm/ http://mediagoblin.com/ http://www.wikipedia.org/ > Free software but microprocessors dictatorship ? What i am saying is > that 2 companies dominate that market of microprocessors (your computer > run without them ?), Which two? Intel dominates the market but ARM has surprised a lot of people. AMD, Oracle, IBM, Apple and others are still producing their own processors, and then there's the Chinese... The economics of hardware are a different matter from the freedom to use the hardware that one owns however. > whats the alternative to that and how can you talk about a free software in > that situation. The full-stack alternative is running GNU Social on an FGPA-based GNU/Linux box over a mesh network. More practically, use the smallest ISP you can find to connect your GNU/Linux box to free network services, and don't overlook old-fashioned free media like mailing lists. :-) - Rob. _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
