On 22/11/11 15:11, Simon Biggs wrote: > > The story below indicates things move fast, are not always reported > accurately and that people sometimes find themselves in impossible
The original reports have been confirmed by multiple eye witnesses and multiple video recordings. > positions. Nevertheless, they should take responsibility. Perhaps The chancellor's taking of responsibility appears to be purely a verbal rather than a moral act. > something good will come out of this horrible mess, if the UC system > ends up changing its regulations on campus policing? That would be a good outcome. As would a fourth amendment case against the university that will establish actual discouragements for chemically assaulting peacefully protesting students rather than just a temporary change in regulations that can be rolled back as soon as the current intake graduate. I don't disagree that engaging with the students might be more productive than refusing to engage with their attackers. But this is a situation where anyone who can bring pressure to bear on the university administration *now* rather than in six months time should strongly consider doing so. - Rob. _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
