My unpublished next installment in my long work is called OOD (Object-Oriented Design)
and uses some of the work of the Objectivist poets, and some neo baroque embedded devices and ... here, we see the spectre of the posthuman, which has little to do with programming techniques, languages, etc. Just an opinion, Catherine Daly > OOQ – Object-Oriented-Questions. > > Jussi Parikka > > I can’t claim that I know too much about object oriented philosophy. It’s > often more about my friends or colleagues talking about it, enthusiastically > for or against. Indeed, I have been one of those who has at best followed > some of the arguments but not really dipped too deeply into the debates – > which from early on, formed around specific persons, specific arguments, and > a specific way of interacting. > > Hence, let me just be naïve for a second, and think aloud a couple of > questions: > > - I wonder if there is a problem with the notion of object in the sense > that it still implies paradoxically quite a correlationist, or lets say, > human-centred view to the world; is not the talk of “object” something that > summons an image of perceptible, clearly lined, even stable entity – > something that to human eyes could be thought of as the normal mode of > perception. We see objects in the world. Humans, benches, buses, cats, > trashcans, gloves, computers, images, and so forth. But what would a cat, > bench, bus, trashcan, or a computer “see”, or sense? > > more... > http://jussiparikka.net/2011/12/21/ooq-object-oriented-questions/ > _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
