David Ahern <d...@cumulusnetworks.com> wrote: > On 1/6/17 8:30 AM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote: > > This patch adds a per-interface sysctl to have the kernel put > > autoconf routes into different tables. This allows each interface > > to have its own routing table if desired. Choosing the default > > interface, or using different interfaces at the same time on a > > per-socket or per-packet basis) can be done using policy routing > > mechanisms that use as SO_BINDTODEVICE / IPV6_PKTINFO, mark-based > > routing, or UID-based routing to select specific routing tables.
> Why not use the VRF capability then? create a VRF and assign the interface to > it. > End result is the same -- separate tables and the need to use a > bind-to-device API to hit those routes. Show *really working* config with VRF & IPv6? In my tests - kernel unable to accept DAD, fill logs with "ICMPv6: RA: ndisc_router_discovery failed to add default route" and nothing work. VRF interface don't contains IPv6 address.
