David Ahern <d...@cumulusnetworks.com> wrote: > On 1/9/17 8:30 PM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 12:04 PM, David Ahern <d...@cumulusnetworks.com> > > wrote: > >>> I have no firsthand experience of this myself, but if the problems > >>> that Andrey reports above in this thread are real, then those would > >>> indicate that the code is not well-supported. Being unable to accept > >>> DAD is a pretty serious issue. Andrey, what version of the kernel did > >>> you see this on? > >> > >> Are you referencing an Android or google thread? This patch thread has not > >> mentioned any IPv6 problems. > > > > No, this thread. I see message-ID 8cddkd-etc.ln1@banana.localnet in > > this thread. If you didn't get it, I also see it in the comments on > > patchwork - https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/711956/ > >
> Odd that I did not get that -- checked spam and trash. > Andrey is missing 830218c1add1da16519b71909e5cf21522b7d062 which tells me the > comment is not based on 4.10 or net-next: > $ git describe 830218c1add1da16519b71909e5cf21522b7d062 > v4.8-14744-g830218c1add1 Good catch. I'm running 4.8 without this patch. Current 4.10-rc works. Sorry for noise.
