On 1/9/17 7:01 PM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote: > As others have mentioned, IPv6 on VRFs in client mode is also not > necessarily well-supported at the moment, and I don't know how long it > would take for it to be (assuming it can be made to work properly in > client mode without breaking the primary use cases for VRFs).
That's news to me. What about IPv6 and VRF is not working or well-supported?
