On Thu, 22 Mar 2007, Joy Latten wrote: > > Perhaps a better semantic would be to fail the entire flush operation if > > one of the security checks failed. e.g. loop through for permissions > > first, then if all ok, loop through for deletion. > > > Ok, will code this up and test it if there are no objections.
I'd suggest making the permission loop a noop if CONFIG_SECURITY=n, via a static inline function. -- James Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
