Am 26.05.2015 um 16:36 schrieb Alexander Holler:
Am 26.05.2015 um 14:10 schrieb Nicolas Dichtel:
I don't understand why dumping in another netns is a problem.

It isn't. I just wondered how you (or someone else) is using
NETLINK_LISTEN_ALL_NSID, assuming it already serves a purpose. ;)

Maybe I should correct this, as I've lied because I got a bit bored. Sorry.

That dumping in another netns itself isn't a problem, but you need knowledge about the other namespaces. And if you have to go through all the pain to find and dump the interfaces in all other namenspaces by joining them, than there is not that much advantage in using NETLINK_LISTEN_ALL_NSID as you could still listen in another netns after the dump there too.

But there's no need to continue the discussion. I've understood that the patch series was only meant to reduce the number of sockets one otherwise would have continuously listen to.

Alexander Holler
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to