On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Balazs Scheidler wrote:

> I'd like to make tproxies easier to administer, so I'm thinking about a
> simple way of matching tproxied packets, which can be ACCEPTed from the
> INPUT chain.
>
> Possible solutions:
>
> * use a new state (called TPROXY), which would be applied to all TPROXYed
>   packets (might interact badly with nat/conntrack).
> * have the tproxy framework mark all packets with an fwmark, and let the
>   packets in based on the value of fwmark
> * have a separate match (called tproxy), which matches tproxied sessions
>   based on some value stored in the associated conntrack entry
>
> which one do you prefer?

The latter seems to me the best solution.

Regards,
Jozsef
-
E-mail  : [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW-Home: http://www.kfki.hu/~kadlec
Address : KFKI Research Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics
          H-1525 Budapest 114, POB. 49, Hungary


Reply via email to