On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 01:02:44PM +0200, Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote: > On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Balazs Scheidler wrote: > > > ok, should I simply add fields somewhere in struct ip_conntrack, or there's > > a bitfield I can add a flag to? > > There is no such bitfield you could use at the moment. > > > Looking at the struct I can't see a place general enough, so I can add a new > > field just to hold a single bit, or a general "flags" field, which can be > > used by other matches later. > > This is a good question. Probably it is better to add a (general) 'flags' > field. But I have no idea for what else we could use it :-)
As I added a flags argument to ip_nat_setup_info() (currently with a single bit specifying that NAT helpers are to be bypassed), this flags could be stored in ct->nat.flags -- Bazsi PGP info: KeyID 9AF8D0A9 Fingerprint CD27 CFB0 802C 0944 9CFD 804E C82C 8EB1
