>We are currently running NetMeeting 3.0 on a Windows NT workstation (EN450)
>using a Winnov Videum Capture card, the second workstation
>(Armada 1750)
>is running Netmeeting 3.0 on Windows 95 using Kodak DVC325 camera,
>utilizing
>USB. The video from the WindowsNT workstation to the Windows 95 is more
>crsip than the video from the Windows 95 workstation to the WindowsNT
>workstation.. Any ideas?
Could be a number of things:
1) the visual quality of the camera would be a factor -- what camera are you
using with the capture card?
2) the capture card itself will do a better job of capturing than most USB
capture devices
3) I don't know from the model numbers but depending on capture size, audio
encoding the 95 machine might mean that the cpu for capture encodigng
limited
4) What is the connectivity/bandwidth/capture size both ways?
5) Are quality slider settings the same at both ends
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.meetingbywire.com/Mailinglist.htm for unsubscribe information
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
