Brian Sullivan wrote:
> >We are currently running NetMeeting 3.0 on a Windows NT workstation (EN450)
> >using a Winnov Videum Capture card, the second workstation
> >(Armada 1750)
> >is running Netmeeting 3.0 on Windows 95 using Kodak DVC325 camera,
> >utilizing
> >USB. The video from the WindowsNT workstation to the Windows 95 is more
> >crsip than the video from the Windows 95 workstation to the WindowsNT
> >workstation.. Any ideas?
>
> Could be a number of things:
>
> 1) the visual quality of the camera would be a factor -- what camera are you
> using with the capture card?
> 2) the capture card itself will do a better job of capturing than most USB
> capture devices
> 3) I don't know from the model numbers but depending on capture size, audio
> encoding the 95 machine might mean that the cpu for capture encodigng
> limited
> 4) What is the connectivity/bandwidth/capture size both ways?
> 5) Are quality slider settings the same at both ends
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> http://www.meetingbywire.com/Mailinglist.htm for unsubscribe information
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
well i will tell you that i have realized. i have windows 95 --intel pc camera
pack usb and it is not compatible with netmeeting 3.0 so i have to use
netmeeting 2.1.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.meetingbywire.com/Mailinglist.htm for unsubscribe information
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
