Hi Anees, I was hoping this was going to come up on the call, but since it didn't...
> hi -- some additional comments inline. I think that the revisit on some of > the operator requirements is primarily due to some proposed solution's > inability to address them. Can you elaborate on this? Is it an "inability" to address them, or just that they don't address them currently? Thanks, Kent
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
