> On Dec 15, 2015:12:08 PM, at 12:08 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder
> <j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 04:48:21PM +0000, Kent Watsen wrote:
>>
>> The minutes for IETF 95 show that there was in-room support for adopting
>> draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang as a WG draft. The minutes also show
>> that this decision would be confirmed on the mailing list, which I am doing
>> now.
>>
>> Should we move to adopt draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang as a WG item and
>> correspondingly add this to the WG charter as a milestone? Please comment
>> by Tuesday, December 22, 2015 at 9AM EST at which time the WG Chairs will
>> gauge whether or not there is consensus to move forward with the document.
>>
>
> This I-D contains some Ethernet specific definitions. Are we going to
> define Ethernet specific things in the IETF or is IEEE ready to take
> over data models for 'their' interfaces? In other words, what exactly
> is the scope of this work?
The IEEE has officially started working on Ethernet models on
the public github repo here, so I suggest taking a look at that for any
overlaps.
https://github.com/YangModels/yang/tree/master/experimental/ieee
—Tom
>
> And (likely depending on the answer to the first question), is it
> meaningful to produce an interface extension module or is it better to
> simply carefully revise the model we already have?
>
> If we add something to the work of this WG, what will be realistic
> milestones and how do we make sure we stay focused? Is there a need
> for some prioritization?
>
> /js
>
> --
> Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
> Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
