> On Dec 15, 2015:12:08 PM, at 12:08 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder > <j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 04:48:21PM +0000, Kent Watsen wrote: >> >> The minutes for IETF 95 show that there was in-room support for adopting >> draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang as a WG draft. The minutes also show >> that this decision would be confirmed on the mailing list, which I am doing >> now. >> >> Should we move to adopt draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang as a WG item and >> correspondingly add this to the WG charter as a milestone? Please comment >> by Tuesday, December 22, 2015 at 9AM EST at which time the WG Chairs will >> gauge whether or not there is consensus to move forward with the document. >> > > This I-D contains some Ethernet specific definitions. Are we going to > define Ethernet specific things in the IETF or is IEEE ready to take > over data models for 'their' interfaces? In other words, what exactly > is the scope of this work?
The IEEE has officially started working on Ethernet models on the public github repo here, so I suggest taking a look at that for any overlaps. https://github.com/YangModels/yang/tree/master/experimental/ieee —Tom > > And (likely depending on the answer to the first question), is it > meaningful to produce an interface extension module or is it better to > simply carefully revise the model we already have? > > If we add something to the work of this WG, what will be realistic > milestones and how do we make sure we stay focused? Is there a need > for some prioritization? > > /js > > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod