> On 15 Jan 2016, at 15:10, Andy Bierman <a...@yumaworks.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 3:55 AM, Ladislav Lhotka <lho...@nic.cz> wrote:
> 
> > On 15 Jan 2016, at 12:49, Juergen Schoenwaelder 
> > <j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:39:16PM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> >>
> >> Does this solve any practical problem? Modules are imported based on
> >> the module name and revision. On the other hand, it does create new 
> >> problems:
> >> namespace URIs and their mappings to prefixes may be spread in many
> >> places in the code, and these would have to be manually edited after an
> >> I-D -> RFC transition.
> >>
> >> It would IMO be much better to use revision numbers rather than dates,
> >> and adopt a convention, e.g., that modules in the I-D stage have
> >> revisions 0.x that get bumped with each new revision of the I-D.
> >>
> >
> > Lada, this is not how our current YANG 1.0 versioning and revision
> > rules work and we are not going to change them in YANG 1.1 either.
> > The rules we have do make a distinction between published modules and
> > modules that are unpublished.
> 
> I am not proposing it. The problem I'd like to get solved is proper module 
> revisioning already at the I-D stage so that implementations be able to 
> distinguish one revision from another. Appending DRAFT to the namespace URI 
> doesn't help anything.
> 
> 
> 
> Changing the module name constantly does not help.
> It would be better to just keep using revision dates.

Some I-Ds don't do even that, for example acl-model uses the same revision date 
in subsequent I-D revisions. I checked that this actually violates a MUST in 
RFC 6087.

Lada

> 
> 
> Lada
> 
> 
> 
> Andy
>  
> >
> > /js
> >
> > --
> > Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> > Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
> > Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
> 
> --
> Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs
> PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C

--
Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs
PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C




_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to