Kent,
Thanks for the response see below.
On February 9, 2016 3:54:41 PM Kent Watsen <kwat...@juniper.net> wrote:
Hi Lou,
I know that this is a difference between the solutions, but I don’t see it
listed as a requirement. There is a requirement to return the diff, but
that’s all. Is there actually a need to return both sets of data? - or is
this just a desire for the diff to be able to return both (as oppose to the
transform)?
What I see is from draft-ietf-netmod-opstate-reqs
C. Be able to retrieve both the applied configuration and
derived state aspects of operational state together
Maybe I’m turned around, but I thought this was about returning both
intended and applied configurations together at the same time, which I
didn’t know was a requirement. Certainly returning applied config +
derived state (e.g., all op state) is a requirement, as you cite above.
You're headed the right way. Was just pointing out what is in the
requirement document.
I see the original OpenConfig doc/approach as supporting this (returning
both sets) but not stating this as an explicit requirement. I do think
I've heard such usage in discussions too.
Yes, actually, they returned all three sets of data (intended config,
applied config, and derived state)
Just wondering if this is a must-have or a nice-to-have.
I think this is one for Anees/Rob...
It would be good to get that clarification.
Agreed.
Lou
I wonder if it might be considered errata ;)
Kent
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
