Sorry for the late response. It took some time to review this draft and models. And Yes, I support adopting this document as a WG item.
To me, the common model is something useful. There perhaps some overlaps in Ethernet-like model with things in IEEE. If yes, we’ll see how to cooperate. Best Regards, Yan 发件人: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Kent Watsen 发送时间: 2016年3月1日 7:07 收件人: netmod@ietf.org 主题: Re: [netmod] call for consensus to adopt draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang as NETMOD WG draft The chairs were just reviewing notes and realized that this thread never closed properly. Juergen has some concerns regarding realistic milestones, that were never addressed. Robert, can you please try to address Juergen’s concerns now? Also, there were only a two responses before indicating willingness to review the draft as it progresses (thanks Dan and Martin). Can others that support this draft and willing to review this draft say so? Thanks, Netmod Chairs From: netmod <netmod-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of Kent Watsen <kwat...@juniper.net<mailto:kwat...@juniper.net>> Date: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 at 11:48 AM To: "netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org>" <netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org>> Subject: [netmod] call for consensus to adopt draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang as NETMOD WG draft The minutes for IETF 94 show that there was in-room support for adopting draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang as a WG draft. The minutes also show that this decision would be confirmed on the mailing list, which I am doing now. Should we move to adopt draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang as a WG item and correspondingly add this to the WG charter as a milestone? Please comment by Tuesday, December 22, 2015 at 9AM EST at which time the WG Chairs will gauge whether or not there is consensus to move forward with the document. Thanks, Kent
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
